Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nam Hoang Ly vs Michal Mikula Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ly vs Mikula analysis and find out who is favored!
Nam Hoang Ly vs Michal Mikula Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ly 1 - 0 Mikula
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ly has won 51.43% of points on their second serve, while Mikula has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ly, in recent form, has won 57.06% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mikula has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.62% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ly has saved 59.43% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mikula has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ly has won 56.86% of matches played (W/L 29/ 22), with Mikula winning 22.22% (W/L 2/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ly has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 245/ 127), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 14/ 15). Mikula has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 51/ 36), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 39/ 42).
- Player level: In the last year, Ly has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70.97% of matches (W/L 22/ 9), where as Mikula has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 22.22% of matches (W/L 2/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ly winning 1 times and Mikula being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ly winning 2 and Mikula winning 0. The last match between Ly and Mikula was at the M15 Creteil, 09-03-2022, First, I.hard with Nam Hoang Ly getting the victory 7-6(4) 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:4:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ly and Mikula have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ly winning 0 times and Mikula 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Ly winning 2, and Mikula 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ly has played against opponents with an average rank of 214.75 while Mikula has played against players with an average rank of 231.89.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ly has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mikula has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ly has converted 49.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mikula has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
489
Rank
231
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
65% (277-152)
Career Total W/L
53% (104-91)
71% (15-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nam Hoang Ly | Michal Mikula |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 14 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:4:0 | 2:4:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (51/79) | 62% (53/86) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (37/51) | 66% (35/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (14/28) | 39% (13/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (38/86) | 35% (28/79) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Nam Hoang Ly
Player
Michal Mikula
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nam Hoang Ly | Michal Mikula |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (15/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 71% (32/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (238/188) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (15/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 63 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 24 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:8 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 178.05 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (786/1171) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (545/786) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (198/385) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (70/141) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (565/1297) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (15/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (15/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (16/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (16/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Nam Hoang Ly Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Nam Hoang Ly
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
12
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Nam Hoang Ly
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nam Hoang Ly
Player
Thanapet Chanta
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nam Hoang Ly
Player
Nitin Kumar Sinha
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
3
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nam Hoang Ly
Player
Raghav Jaisinghani
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Nam Hoang Ly
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nam Hoang Ly
Player
Manish Sureshkumar
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nam Hoang Ly
Player
Bang Shuo Yin
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nam Hoang Ly
Player
Manish Ganesh
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-7(4) 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Michal Mikula Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Brunclik
Player
Michal Mikula
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonas Pelle Hartenstein
Player
Michal Mikula
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
45%
(
18 of
40)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vladyslav Orlov
Player
Michal Mikula
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Michal Mikula
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Michal Mikula
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
83)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Georgii Kravchenko
Player
Michal Mikula
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Michal Mikula
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
43%
(
19 of
44)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michal Mikula
Player
David Poljak
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michal Mikula
Player
Adam Majchrzak
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leo Borg
Player
Michal Mikula
53%
(
49 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
107)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ly Vs Mikula Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
